Cybernetic Big Five Theory

Cybernetic Big Five Theory is the most scientific way of looking at personality as it is based on neuroscience rather than psychology. Cybernetic Big Five Theory is of course a form of cybernetics. The first lesson of Cybernetic Big Five Theory is that there isn’t such a thing as personality. Instead there are evolutionary behavioral patterns that our brain produced due to the biological structure of our brain. Although it is called Cybernetic Big Five Theory, in reality there are different levels of abstraction as to describe these evolutionary behavioral patterns. At the highest level of abstraction there is the Big Two, followed by the Big Five and the Big Ten. Cybernetic Big Five Theory is extremely important for football. For knowing which evolutionary behavioral pattern your players have, makes the difference between understanding them and knowing how to deal with them or not. For more than twenty years I have developed The Neurogram® model which is based on Cybernetic Big Five Theory, but provides a dynamic version of Cybernetic Big Five Theory that shows how people evolutionary behavioral patterns change depending on whether they are stressed or relaxed or neither. The Neurogram® also allows you to determine people’s typical set of evolutionary behavioral patterns without the need of an fMRI scanner.

Here is the hierarchical heuristic scheme of Cybernetic Big Five Theory:

Evolutionary Behavioral Pattern Cybernetic Function Opposite Pole
Big Two
Stability (defending) Protection of goals, interpretations, and strategies from disruption by impulses Creativity (attacking)
Exploration (scanning) Creation of new goals, interpretations, and strategies Exploitation (passing)
Big Five
Extraversion  Behavioral exploration and engagement with specific rewards (i.e., goals to approach) Detached
Openness to experience (tactics) Cognitive exploration and engagement with information Openness to reasoning (strategy)
Conscientiousness (discipline) Protection of nonimmediate or abstract goals and strategies from disruption Disinhibition (undisciplined)
Agreeableness  Altruism and cooperation; coordination of goals, interpretations, and strategies with those of others Antagonistic
Unflappable Defensive responses to uncertainty, threat, and punishment Neuroticism 
Big Ten
Assertiveness  Incentive reward sensitivity: drive toward goals Letting others go first
Enthusiasm  Hedonic reward sensitivity: enjoyment of actual or imagined goal attainment Unenthusiastic
Even tempered Active defense to avoid or eliminate threats  Volatility
Self-assured Passive avoidance: inhibition of goals, interpretations, and strategies in response to uncertainty or error Withdrawal (anxiety, depression)
Intellect  Detection of logical or causal patterns in abstract and semantic information Unintellectual
Openness to experience Detection of spatial and temporal correlational patterns in sensory and perceptual information Imperceptive
Industriousness Prioritization of nonimmediate goals  Undisciplined
Orderliness  Avoidance of entropy by following rules set by self or others Disorganized
Compassion  Emotional attachment to and concern for others Callous
Politeness  Suppression and avoidance of aggressive or norm-violating impulses and strategies Belligerent

(Source: DeYoung, C. G., & Weisberg, Y. J. (2019). Cybernetic approaches to personality and social behavior. In M. Snyder & K. Deaux (Eds). Oxford Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Second Edition (pp. 387–414). New York: Oxford University Press)

Cybernetic Big Five Theory and football

In my own research I am working with a circumspect model of Cybernetic Big Five Theory. DeYoung himself is also looking into circumspect models for his work. What is still speculative is whether defending as Stability, attacking as Autonomy / Creativity, passing as Exploitation and scanning as Exploration also correlate with specific sets of these evolutionary behavioral patterns. If they do, the circumspect model looks like this: